Current:Home > MarketsGrizzly bears coming back to Washington state as some decry return of 'apex predator' -TrueNorth Finance Path
Grizzly bears coming back to Washington state as some decry return of 'apex predator'
View
Date:2025-04-12 07:39:31
Grizzly bears will roam Washington state once again after federal authorities decided in April that the animals will be restored to the North Cascades ecosystem.
The National Park Service and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service signed an agreement in April to bring grizzlies back to the North Cascades mountain range, a decision that is the result of a process that began in 2022.
"The purpose of this plan is to restore the grizzly bear to the (North Cascades ecosystem), a portion of its historical range," according to the Joint Record of Decision.
How will the agencies bring back grizzlies to Washington state?
To restore the bears to North Cascades, the federal agencies will undergo a translocation process that will bring in grizzlies from other ecosystems in the Rocky Mountains or interior British Columbia, the National Park Service said in a news release.
Once in the North Cascades, the grizzlies will be designated as a "nonessential experimental population" under the Endangered Species Act, according to the agency.
"The designation will provide authorities and land managers with additional tools for management that would not otherwise be available under existing Endangered Species Act regulations," the agency said.
Why do the agencies want grizzlies back in Washington state
Grizzlies have been rooted out of the North Cascades ecosystem since they were listed as "threatened" in the lower 48 states under the Endangered Species Act on July 28, 1975, according to the agencies. Thousands of grizzlies were killed for their fur, causing them to be spotted sporadically since 1996, the agencies added.
Restoring grizzlies to the mountain range will help enhance the variety of life in the ecosystem and make it more resilient to disturbances, which benefits and contributes to the enjoyment of people of present and future generations, the agencies said.
In addition to helping the ecosystem, the restoration efforts will "enhance the probability of long-term survival of grizzly bears in the (North Cascades ecosystem) and thereby contribute to overall grizzly bear recovery through redundancy in multiple populations and representation in a variety of habitats," the agencies continued.
The end goal of restoring grizzlies to North Cascades is to get the bear's population to the point where it can be removed from the federal list of engaged and threatened wildlife, according to the agencies.
How long will it take to get grizzlies back to North Cascades?
The grizzlies in the North Cascades will initially begin with a "founder population" of 25 bears over the next five to 10 years, and the animals will be released into remote parts of the forest, according to the agencies.
The agencies said they plan to release three to seven grizzlies each year with the goal being a population of 200 bears inhabiting the North Cascades ecosystem within 60 to 100 years.
Jason Ransom, a wildlife biologist at North Cascades National Park, told NBC News that "there’s a lot to be done before we could even come up with a timeline."
“For a project like this to be successful, it’s really important you get the planning right," Ransom said.
Congressman not in favor of grizzlies returning to Washington state
Rep. Dan Newhouse of Washington called the agencies' decision to restore grizzlies "outrageous" and "misguided."
“The National Park Service and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s decision regarding the North Cascades grizzly restoration plan is outrageous, yet consistent based on the recent actions of this administration,” Newhouse said in a statement.
Newhouse's statement went on to criticize the federal government's decision-making and lack of care for residents' input.
"Throughout this entire process, I have been hearing from local residents, participating in public comment sessions, and meeting with the National Park Service and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to prevent this misguided decision from moving forward, and today’s announcement reinforces what we feared: no amount of local opposition was going to prevent these federal bureaucrats from doing what they wanted all along," the congressman said.
'We're busy dealing with wolves'
Rachel McClure, a rancher in Washington state's Okanogan County, told NBC News, "We already have predator issues in the state. We don’t need another apex predator when we can’t deal with what we have."
"We’re busy dealing with wolves," McClure said. "We don’t need to be thinking about bears.”
The Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife (WDFW) said it counted 260 wolves in 42 packs in Washington state at the end of 2023. Twenty-five of the packs were successful breeding pairs.
"Gray wolves play a large role as an apex species and can influence the dynamics of wildlife species across an entire ecosystem," the WDFW said.
veryGood! (9399)
Related
- How to watch new prequel series 'Dexter: Original Sin': Premiere date, cast, streaming
- Biden administration proposes rule for workplaces to address excessive heat
- Small businesses could find filing for bankruptcy more difficult as government program expires
- Small businesses could find filing for bankruptcy more difficult as government program expires
- Trump invites nearly all federal workers to quit now, get paid through September
- Ann Wilson announces cancer diagnosis, postpones Heart tour
- Chet Hanks Reveals Cokeheads Advised Him to Chill Amid Addiction Battle
- The Daily Money: CDK outage draws to a close
- Realtor group picks top 10 housing hot spots for 2025: Did your city make the list?
- 'Don’t do that to your pets': Video shows police rescue dog left inside hot trailer
Ranking
- Former longtime South Carolina congressman John Spratt dies at 82
- The Real Reason Nick Cannon Insured His Balls for $10 Million
- AccuWeather: False Twitter community notes undermined Hurricane Beryl forecast, warnings
- Fed Chair Jerome Powell: US inflation is slowing again, though it isn’t yet time to cut rates
- As Trump Enters Office, a Ripe Oil and Gas Target Appears: An Alabama National Forest
- Virginia Senate takes no action on move to repeal military tuition program restrictions
- NBA free agency tracker: Klay Thompson to Mavericks; Tatum getting record extension
- US to pay for flights to help Panama remove migrants who may be heading north
Recommendation
Paige Bueckers vs. Hannah Hidalgo highlights women's basketball games to watch
Melting of Alaska’s Juneau icefield accelerates, losing snow nearly 5 times faster than in the 1980s
Stingray that went viral after mysterious pregnancy dies, aquarium says
Chicken Soup for the Soul Entertainment, swamped by debt, declares bankruptcy
Bill Belichick's salary at North Carolina: School releases football coach's contract details
Naomi Osaka wins at Wimbledon for the first time in 6 years, and Coco Gauff moves on, too
Arthur Crudup: What to know about the bluesman who wrote Elvis’s first hit and barely got paid
Judge sides with 16 states, putting on pause Biden’s delay of consideration of gas export projects