Current:Home > InvestTrump seeks dismissal of charges in Stormy Daniels hush money case -TrueNorth Finance Path
Trump seeks dismissal of charges in Stormy Daniels hush money case
View
Date:2025-04-23 18:35:15
As Donald Trump fights a $250 million civil fraud lawsuit in New York, the former president has asked another New York judge to dismiss criminal charges he is facing over hush money paid to adult film actress Stormy Daniels.
Trump in April pleaded not guilty to nearly three dozen felony counts of falsifying business records stemming from monthly reimbursement payments to his former fixer Michael Cohen, who paid Daniels $130,000 to keep quiet about a long-denied affair she said she had with Trump.
"President Trump cannot be said to have falsified business records of the Trump Organization by paying his personal attorney using his personal bank accounts," defense attorney Todd Blanche said in the motion, which called the case a "discombobulated package of politically motivated charges."
MORE: Timeline: Manhattan DA's Stormy Daniels hush money case against Donald Trump
"The pendency of these proceedings, and the manner in which they were initiated, calls into question the integrity of the criminal justice process, is inconsistent with bedrock due process principles, and is interfering with the campaign of the leading candidate in the 2024 presidential election," the motion said.
The Manhattan district attorney's office alleges that Trump and Cohen worked with executives from American Media, Inc. -- owners of the National Enquirer -- to identify and suppress potential negative news stories during the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.
Prosecutors said Trump Organization records were falsified because they indicate the payments to Cohen were part of a "retainer" for legal services that did not exist. The charges were elevated to felonies because the district attorney's office said Trump intended "to commit another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof."
There was no immediate comment on the former president's motion to dismiss from Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg.
Bragg brought the indictment in March after a yearslong investigation that Trump's defense attorneys said violated Trump's rights.
"The delay has prejudiced President Trump, interfered with his ongoing presidential campaign, and violated his due process rights. Accordingly, the Court should dismiss the indictment or, in the alternative, conduct a hearing to determine the reason for the delay," the motion said.
The case is among four criminal prosecutions the former president faces, in addition to the ongoing civil fraud suit and a defamation suit. The trial on the hush money case is scheduled for May of 2024, just weeks after the scheduled start of Trump's federal trial on charges of attempting to overturn the results of the 2020 election.
The former president has denied all wrongdoing and denounced the charges as a political witch hunt.
veryGood! (82)
Related
- Trump wants to turn the clock on daylight saving time
- Climate Change Makes Things Harder for Unhoused Veterans
- Is Threads really a 'Twitter killer'? Here's what we know so far
- Alix Earle Influenced Me To Add These 20 Products to My Amazon Cart for Prime Day 2023
- DoorDash steps up driver ID checks after traffic safety complaints
- Inside Clean Energy: The Idea of 100 Percent Renewable Energy Is Once Again Having a Moment
- Fox News hit with another defamation lawsuit — this one over Jan. 6 allegations
- Janet Yellen heads to China, seeking to ease tensions between the two economic powers
- A White House order claims to end 'censorship.' What does that mean?
- Inside Clean Energy: ‘Solar Coaster’ Survivors Rejoice at Senate Bill
Ranking
- Alex Murdaugh’s murder appeal cites biased clerk and prejudicial evidence
- For the Third Time, Black Residents in Corpus Christi’s Hillcrest Neighborhood File a Civil Rights Complaint to Fend Off Polluting Infrastructure
- The marketing whiz behind chia pets and their iconic commercials has died
- This is Canada's worst fire season in modern history — but it's not new
- What do we know about the mysterious drones reported flying over New Jersey?
- For the Third Time, Black Residents in Corpus Christi’s Hillcrest Neighborhood File a Civil Rights Complaint to Fend Off Polluting Infrastructure
- Outnumbered: In Rural Ohio, Two Supporters of Solar Power Step Into a Roomful of Opposition
- The creator of luxury brand Brother Vellies is fighting for justice in fashion
Recommendation
What were Tom Selleck's juicy final 'Blue Bloods' words in Reagan family
Microsoft says Chinese hackers breached email, including U.S. government agencies
New lawsuit says social media and gun companies played roles in 2022 Buffalo shooting
The Bachelorette's Tayshia Adams Deserves the Final Rose for Deal Hunting With Her Prime Day Picks
Person accused of accosting Rep. Nancy Mace at Capitol pleads not guilty to assault charge
Amazon Prime Day 2023 Tech Deals: Save on Apple Watches, Samsung's Frame TV, Bose Headphones & More
Chicago Institutions Just Got $25 Million to Study Local Effects of Climate Change. Here’s How They Plan to Use It
Inside Clean Energy: ‘Solar Coaster’ Survivors Rejoice at Senate Bill