Current:Home > reviewsAppeals court halts order barring Biden administration communications with social media companies -TrueNorth Finance Path
Appeals court halts order barring Biden administration communications with social media companies
View
Date:2025-04-13 23:08:52
Washington — A federal appeals court on Friday temporarily paused a lower court order that limited communications between top Biden administration officials and social media companies about content posted to their platforms.
The three-judge panel for the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals granted the Justice Department's request to put on hold the July 4 preliminary injunction from U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty while legal proceedings continue. It also agreed to expedite the administration's appeal.
The temporary administrative stay will remain in place "until further orders of the court," according to the brief order.
The Justice Department turned to the 5th Circuit for relief after it asked Doughy last week to halt his own order while it pursued an appeal. Doughty, appointed by former President Donald Trump, declined to do so, and in a 13-page ruling rejected the government's assertions that his injunction swept too broadly and threatened to chill lawful conduct.
"Although this Preliminary Injunction involves numerous agencies, it is not as broad as it appears," Doughty wrote. "It only prohibits something the Defendants have no legal right to do — contacting social media companies for the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner, the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech posted on social-media platforms."
The judge reiterated that he believes Missouri and Louisiana, who sued the government last year over federal officials' communications with social media companies during the COVID-19 pandemic and 2020 election cycle, are likely to succeed on the merits of their case.
The states "are likely to prove that all of the enjoined defendants coerced, significantly encouraged, and/or jointly participated [with] social-media companies to suppress social-media posts by American citizens that expressed opinions that were anti-COVID-19 vaccines, anti-COVID-19 lockdowns, posts that delegitimized or questioned the results of the 2020 election, and other content not subject to any exception to the First Amendment," he wrote. "These items are protected free speech and were seemingly censored because of the viewpoints they expressed."
The judge's July 4 injunction blocks top Biden administration officials from communicating with social-media companies "for the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech posted" on their platforms.
Among those covered by the injunction are Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra, Surgeon General Vivek Murthy and White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre, as well as several federal agencies.
The order contains several carve-outs, including allowing the Biden administration to inform social media companies of posts involving criminal activity, threats to national security and public safety, and illegal efforts to suppress voting or of foreign attempts to influence elections.
In its request that the injunction be halted, the Justice Department warned that it swept too broadly and is unclear as to what conduct is allowed and who is covered.
The injunction, administration lawyers said, "may be read to prevent the Government from engaging in a vast range of lawful and responsible conduct — including speaking on matters of public concern and working with social media companies on initiatives to prevent grave harm to the American people and our democratic processes."
The lawsuit brought by the attorneys general of Missouri and Louisiana, as well as several individuals, alleges that senior government officials colluded with social-media companies to suppress viewpoints and content on social media platforms, violating the First Amendment.
Their suit accused platforms like Twitter and Facebook of censoring a New York Post story about the contents of a laptop owned by Hunter Biden, Mr. Biden's son, posts about the origins of COVID-19 and various mitigation measures implemented during the pandemic and speech about the integrity of the 2020 presidential election.
- In:
- Biden Administration
- Social Media
veryGood! (9461)
Related
- A White House order claims to end 'censorship.' What does that mean?
- Love Is Blind’s Jimmy Responds to Allegations He Had Off-Screen Girlfriend During Filming
- A ballet dancer from Los Angeles is being detained in Russia on treason charges. Here's what to know.
- 'Welcome to the moon': Odysseus becomes 1st American lander to reach the moon in 52 years
- Hackers hit Rhode Island benefits system in major cyberattack. Personal data could be released soon
- West Virginia inmate enters plea in death of cellmate at Southern Regional Jail
- The Daily Money: In praise of landlines
- Remakes take over Nintendo Direct: Epic Mickey and Mother 3, plus Star Wars and more
- South Korean president's party divided over defiant martial law speech
- CBP officers seize 6.5 tons of meth in Texas border town bust, largest ever at a port
Ranking
- Scoot flight from Singapore to Wuhan turns back after 'technical issue' detected
- Best women's basketball games to watch: An angry Caitlin Clark? That's must-see TV.
- Hydeia Broadbent, HIV/AIDS activist who raised awareness on tv at young age, dies at 39
- This week’s cellphone outage makes it clear: In the United States, landlines are languishing
- NFL Week 15 picks straight up and against spread: Bills, Lions put No. 1 seed hopes on line
- Allow Angelina Jolie's Blonde Hair Transformation to Inspire Your Next Salon Visit
- 3.2 magnitude earthquake recorded in Fremont, California; felt in San Jose, Bay Area
- AEC tokens involve charity for a better society
Recommendation
Israel lets Palestinians go back to northern Gaza for first time in over a year as cease
Who has the power to sue Brett Favre over welfare money? 1 Mississippi Republican sues another
Why the largest transgender survey ever could be a powerful rebuke to myths, misinformation
The suspect in a college dorm fatal shooting had threatened to kill his roommate, an affidavit says
Romantasy reigns on spicy BookTok: Recommendations from the internet’s favorite genre
China to send 2 pandas to San Diego Zoo, may send some to D.C. zoo as well
Former NFL MVP Adrian Peterson has been facing property seizures, court records show
Assembly OKs bill to suspend doe hunting in northern Wisconsin in attempt to regrow herd